productivity of California's irrigated farms would result in a loss of $167 million, according to federal estimates.
The most severely affected areas are irrigated regions of the West. In the Mid west by contrast, irrigation relies on less saline water, and even irrigated fields receive enough rain to reduce the salt concentrations.
Worldwide, the acreage that is deteriorating is roughly equivalent to the amount of new acreage being irrigated each year, according to the Worldwatch Institute, a non-profit research organization in Washington, D.C.
Mayo Ryan's fields are among some 4 million acres in California, nearly half of the amount of the state's irrigated farm acreage, estimated to suffer from salt buildup.
When he tested water draining from his fields years ago, it was 10 times saltier than the ocean. The production of the land fell as the salinity rose; fields that used to produce 21/2 bales of hay per acre now average 1 3/4 bales.
The cure for the buildup is to flush away the salts and other trace elements so they do not accumulate in dangerous levels. But that requires water, lots of it, in a place where supplies are scarce. Moreover, it requires a place to put the wastes, and in the San Joaquin Valley, a drain to dispose of farms'
|
|
wastewater is literally a pipe dream.
State and federal governments spent billions of dollars planning and building the vast water-supply network that made the valley into an agricultural empire. However, the final portion of the system, a drain to the Pacific Ocean to dispose of the salts, was never built first because the state's farmers refused to pay for it and later because of environmental concerns about dumping untreated farm wastewater into waterways.
All this has been the grist for bitter disputes, some of them still going on in courtrooms, among farmers, government and environmentalists. Many farmers here hold the government responsible for their ruined lands and their tainted reputations as the villains behind the environmental disaster.
Government has spent millions studying and advising farmers about how to best manage salinity problems, and how to serve the competing interests of agriculture and the environment that are difficult, if not impossible, to satisfy simultaneously. Environmentalists say farmers must come to terms with the notion that salt and selenium, an element that can be deadly to wildlife, are pollutants produced by agriculture.
Land retirement is not an option to John Diener, a 46-year-old farmer who has spent seven years trans- |
|
forming his 600 acres of family farms into an experimental system designed to keep the salt problem at bay.
"I look at it as a matter of stewardship of the land," Diener said.
The farm is arranged so that wastewater from one plot can be used in another to water crops that tolerate increasingly high levels of salt and selenium. The fields that take on the most salt and selenium grow eucalyptus trees that can be used for paper; shrubs and grass that may be used for animal feed; and salicornia, a plant described as poor man's asparagus that is a popular salad item abroad - though even Diener, an enthusiast for the experiment, concedes, "I don't know how those people in Europe can eat it."
The final, inevitable crops, though, are salt and selenium, coming from an evaporation pond, girded with plastic to protect the soil and armed with butane "canons" that can emit enough noise to keep birds form settling in on the pond.
Terry Young, senior consulting scientist for the Environmental Defense Fund, says this is the problem that must be addressed if irrigated agriculture is to be sustained in the region.
"The only really long-term solution is to create a market for the salt and the selenium," she said.
|